Mohrelle hassan

Artist Statement
Medium: Interdisciplinary
My work looks at wheat as a site of history, labour, and connection to land. It centres on Sona Moti (Golden Pearl), also known as Paighambari wheat, an indigenous variety traced back to the Indus Valley Civilisation over 2,000 years ago. Through research into how multinational agribusiness corporations have reshaped agriculture through hybridised, genetically engineered, and biofortified seeds, the work reflects on changing systems of food production and the forms of dependency they create. Using wheat both materially and metaphorically, it poetically explores relationships between people, land, seeds, and knowledge, considering inheritance, agricultural systems, and shifting forms of control.
Abstract
This thesis examines seed security through the seed as both a source of life and a site of political, ecological, and social significance. Taking wheat in Punjab as a point of focus, it considers how questions of access, seed saving, dependency, and survival are shaped within a region strongly associated with agricultural production. The project reflects on a central tension, that a land tied to cultivation and abundance can remain entangled with forms of external reliance and control. In this context, the seed is approached not only as biological matter, but as something connected with ownership, renewal, vulnerability, and future life.
Informed by wider discussions around seed sovereignty, the research asks how the seed can be understood beyond its agricultural function, as a material that carries broader ethical and political meanings. It is concerned with the conditions through which life is sustained, circulated, and renewed, and with the ways these conditions are tied to larger systems of power. By thinking through the seed in relation to food, survival, and continuity, the thesis explores how a small and familiar forms can open up larger questions about security, control, and collective futures within the present moment of ecological and economic uncertainty.
Introduction
My artistic practice has long been concerned with the mundane, with everyday objects, familar gestures, and small experiences that often pass unnoticed. I am interested in how these seemingly insignificant things can carry meanings that are social, emotional, and political. By recontextualizing, or repositioning them, I try to draw out the narratives and structures hidden within daily life. Over time, this interest in the ordinary has moved beyond the personal and toward broader questions of society, power, and collective experience.
I have always been interested in the idea of control and how it operates, and this has appeared in my work through different subjects over the years. During my second and third year, I often found myself returning to questions around seeds and seed purity. Even when I was working on other ideas, this subject kept coming back. During my thesis, it resurfaced once again and became the starting point of the project.
For my thesis, this line of inquiry has developed into a focus on seed security and seed control in Punjab, the region where I live and study. Punjab is one of the major agricultural regions of Pakistan and is strongly associated with wheat production. Wheat is not only a crop but an everyday staple, something deeply connected to survival, labour, culture, domestic life and the socio political. What interests me is the contradiction that exists here, a place so closely connected to agriculture can still remain dependent on imported seeds and food systems. This led to questions around seed saving, community led seed vaults, awareness of seed access and the extent to which seeds remain fundamental to everyday life while also being shaped by wider political and economic systems.
This project sits at the intersection of personal practice, regional context, and wider ecological and political concerns. This extends my interest in the overlooked everyday life into a more focused engagement with food sovereignty, dependency, and collective futures.
Literature Review
In a YouTube conversation with Elaine McFadden, Vandana Shiva quotes Henry Kissinger:
“When you control arms, you control armies; when you control food, you control societies; but when you control seed, you control life on Earth, the renewable potential of life on Earth.”
My research has been shaped in part by the work of Vandana Shiva, especially her writing on seed sovereignty, biodiversity, and the dangers of corporate control over agricultural systems. Her ideas have helped me think through the political dimensions of seeds, not simply as biological material, but as sites of ownership, power, access, and survival. In the context of increasing economic instability, environmental crisis, and geopolitical uncertainty, seed security begins to appear not only as an agricultural concern, but as a wider social and ethical one.
Vandana Shiva says,
“Industrial farming is the single biggest destructive force on the planet today “.
Although many people have opposed Vandana Shiva’s ideas and repeatedly questioned her integrity, she has remained firm in her beliefs and continued working towards her goals of protecting biodiversity and food sovereignty, while empowering farmers through ecologically sustainable agriculture..
There are many arguments and counterarguments surrounding the use of seeds and contemporary agricultural systems. Over time, it has become increasingly difficult to distinguish between genuine solutions and narratives presented by those who position themselves as the saviors of global food security. Despite decades of scientific intervention, technological innovation, and policy reforms, billions of people around the world continue to experience hunger and malnutrition.
This raises important questions about the systems that shape agriculture today. If solutions are primarily driven by statistics, short-term targets, and technological fixes, can they truly address the deeper structural causes of food insecurity?
Research shows that although global food systems have increased food availability and reduced hunger in many parts of the world, this does not necessarily mean that they are healthy or sustainable. Many foods now pass through extensive industrial processes and contain additives whose long-term effects remain a concern. The consequences may not be immediately visible but can emerge later in life through increasing rates of chronic illnesses such as diabetes, kidney disease, and cancer.
At the same time, many argue that the world already produces enough food to feed everyone. From this perspective, hunger is not simply a problem of production but of waste, access, and unequal distribution. If this is the case, then it is worth asking whether the continued reliance on chemical interventions is the only path forward, or whether existing agricultural knowledge and safer alternatives deserve greater attention.
Bertolt Brecht, in “A Short Organum for the Theatre” from Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic, offers an important way of thinking about how art can make the ordinary available for critical reflection. He suggests that the familiar should not be presented as fixed or self-evident, but in a way that allows it to be seen afresh and questioned. This is relevant to my practice, which often works with everyday objects and overlooked materials. In this project, wheat is not treated as a staple of daily life, but as a material connected with labour, dependency, control, and survival. By recontextualizing it, I aim to shift it from habitual consumption to critical anaylais. In this sense, Brecht provides a useful framework for understanding how the mundane can reveal wider social and political structures
.
I also came across a book called Seed by Gita Wold, illustrated by Tushar Vayeda and Mayur Veda The book is about seeds, with a focus on the Warli community. I found it really interesting because the Warli have their own rituals and traditions around preserving seeds. One of the most interesting practices is that the women of the community perform the sacred task of embedding seeds into mud walls, which are later planted. In the past, they also dug deep pits to store seeds, and the act of digging had its own name: whirl.


As part of the research, a small experiment was also carried out by sprouting moong daal. This allowed a direct engagement with the process of germination and growth through a very ordinary, familiar material.







Research Methodology
Since childhood, I have been going to my family’s farm in Thetar village. During my research, I started spending more time there. I would sit in the fields, talk to the farmers, spend time with the local children, and just be there. Spending time on the farm naturally became part of the way I developed the work.
Gradually, I began to develop a stronger connection to the farm, its landscape,, and everyday activities. As I spent more time there, thoughts and questions started to emerge on their own, and the direction of the project slowly began to take shape.
For this project, I began by researching wheat and the different systems through which it is cultivated today. The research combines conversations with farmers, personal observation, policy research, and discussions with individuals engaged in agriculture, including Samiya Mumtaz, who has been working with indigenous wheat varieties.
One of the main distinctions that emerged through this research was the difference between indigenous, hybrid, biofortified seeds and genetically engineered seeds. These categories are often confused with one another despite functioning very differently. Hybrid seeds are produced through crossbreeding between plant varieties, whereas genetically engineered seeds involve direct genetic modification to introduce specific traits such as drought tolerance or herbicide resistance.
My research focuses particularly on seed certification and commercially controlled seed systems. Most of these seeds are dependent on external agricultural inputs, including pesticides, fertilisers, specialised irrigation systems, and chemical weed control. In many cases, seeds saved from these crops weaken after one or two growing cycles, producing lower yields or becoming more vulnerable to disease. This creates a cycle of dependency in which farmers must continue purchasing seeds each season, along with the additional resources required to sustain them.
Indigenous seed systems function differently. Seeds are saved, exchanged, and regrown over long periods of time, they are naturally resistant to harmful organisms and don’t require much resources like water, allowing cultivation to remain within local knowledge and farming practices rather than external ownership structures. This is also something I have experienced directly through my family’s farm, where desi wheat seeds continue to be saved and replanted every year. The cycle remains continuous and self-sustaining without the constant need for replacement.
Through this research, the seed began to emerge not only as an agricultural object, but also as a site of dependence, ownership, and control. What appears as technological advancement in the present also raises questions about who owns the seed, who controls cultivation, and who ultimately controls food production itself.
The people in positions of power within these systems are not only individuals, but larger institutional, governmental, scientific, and corporate structures that regulate ownership, access, and distribution of seeds. This includes multinational agribusiness corporations such as Bayer, Corteva Agriscience, Syngenta, BASF, and Limagrain, which collectively dominate a large percentage of the global commercial seed market who have planted their roots in local and micro level markets as well. Their influence extends beyond seeds into patents, licensing systems, pesticides, fertilisers, and agricultural policy, influencing what is cultivated and how cultivation takes place.
In Lahore, many wheat varieties are named after the cities or institutions where they were developed. Faisalabad-08, for example, takes its name from Faisalabad, where it was developed at the Wheat Research Institute. Other varieties carry names such as Sahar, Inqilab or Champion 23. Over time, these names begin to function almost like brands, giving each variety a distinct identity and reputation.
State institutions and policymakers have also contributed to these structures through seed laws and agricultural regulations. In Pakistan, the Seed Act of 1976 regulates how seeds are produced, registered, exchanged, and circulated. It establishes institutions such as the National Seed Council and the Federal Seed Certification Department, giving the state authority over the approval, testing, and distribution of seeds. Under this framework, farmers are restricted from selling or sharing unregistered seeds, which strengthens reliance on certified commercial varieties and gradually weakens traditional practices of seed saving and exchange. The 2015 amendment extends this regulatory system by introducing the registration of genetically modified plant varieties and further expanding the role of private seed businesses within the agricultural sector.
The research does not position technology itself as inherently negative. Genetically engineered wheat varieties such as HB4 also known as eco wheat, first commercially cultivated in Argentina and later approved in countries including Brazil and Paraguay, are often presented as solutions to drought and climate instability. Supporters argue that these technologies may increase resilience and productivity under difficult environmental conditions.
However, the project questions the larger systems of control that emerge alongside these technologies. In Pakistan seed systems remain tied to patented ownership structures, herbicide dependence, monoculture farming, and repeated seasonal purchasing. Over time, this can reduce farmers’ autonomy and weaken local systems of cultivation and exchange. The issue therefore extends beyond productivity alone and toward questions of ownership, dependency, and long-term ecological and social impact.
Another important aspect of the research involved observing how wheat exists relationally within indigenous farming systems. Wheat itself grows collectively and densely, functioning as part of a larger ecological network rather than as an isolated unit. Wheat is often grown alongside crops such as sarson, where different plants support one another ecologically and create natural barriers against unwanted organisms. These systems create balance within the soil and reduce vulnerability through diversity and interdependence.
In contrast, industrial agricultural systems often rely on monoculture, the cultivation of genetically similar crops across large areas of land. While these systems may increase uniformity and short-term efficiency, they can also reduce biodiversity and increase long-term vulnerability to disease, soil depletion, and ecological imbalance.
There are alternative agricultural models and ways of self sufficiently growing around the world. Recent research identified Guyana as one of the few countries capable of producing enough food across major food groups to sustain its own population. Part of this is linked to diverse agricultural systems, intercropping methods, and reduced dependence on monoculture farming. These examples suggest other possibilities for cultivation that are rooted in ecological balance and diversity rather than singular systems of production.
Within this project, wheat functions both as material and metaphor. As a staple crop within Punjab, it represents sustenance, labour, continuity, and survival. Through wheat, the work examines how systems of control can become embedded within everyday acts such as growing, saving, exchanging, and consuming food.
Wanting to learn more about wheat beyond my own experience, I visited Samia Mumtaz, who grows her own wheat and has a background in agriculture. It was there that I I was introduced to Sona Moti, an indigenous wheat variety dating back more than 2,000 years to the Indus Valley civilisation. Until then, I had never heard of it. As I learned about its history and qualities, I became interested not only in the disappearance of a single wheat variety but also in what its gradual disappearance reveals about our changing relationship with land, agriculture, and knowledge. What fascinates me is that Sona Moti has become rare, and almost disappeared from public memory.
link: Please click on ‘’watch Video’’



Talking to the farmers about the differences in Hybrid varieties, genetically engineered, bio fortified and Desi seeds.
Hybrid vs Desi Wheat Seeds, Reuse, Water usage, Pesticides, identification, Yield & Cost
Impact of tractors on the land
Sona Moti, meaning “Golden Pearl,” is named for its small, rounded grains.

To understand wheat production on an industrial and commercial scale, I went to Data Flour Mill in Lahore. I visited the Quality Control Laboratory, where wheat is tested for its quality, strength, and baking performance, before moving through the Milling and Packaging Sections. Seeing the process firsthand gave me an understanding of how wheat is handled before it reaches the market.
Me standing between two machines.





















This is a machine that separates metal particles from the wheat.
In an interview with agronomist Niaz Khan, I asked about seed certification, indigenous wheat varieties, chemical agriculture, and contemporary farming practices in Pakistan.
When discussing seed certification, Khan argued that certified and hybrid seeds are typically dependent on external agricultural inputs, including pesticides, fertilisers, specialised irrigation systems, and chemical weed control. He stated that seeds saved from these crops often lose vigour after one or two growing seasons, producing lower yields or becoming more susceptible to disease. In his view, this creates a cycle of dependency in which farmers must continue purchasing new seed and the associated agricultural inputs every season.
Khan questioned the assumption that certified seeds inherently outperform indigenous varieties. He argued that many agricultural soils have become depleted of carbon and biological activity, preventing crops from expressing their full potential. To illustrate this, he suggested that the same seed grown in a healthy ecosystem, such as the Amazon rainforest, would perform very differently from one grown in degraded soil. He maintained that the issue is not simply the genetics of the seed but the condition of the soil itself. He also emphasised that agricultural yield should not be understood solely as the quantity of grain produced but should also include the ecological functions of crops, including their contribution to oxygen production, carbon sequestration, and the overall health of the farming ecosystem.
Discussing the history of wheat cultivation, Khan explained that many indigenous wheat varieties, including Sona Moti, gradually disappeared following the Green Revolution of the 1960s and 1970s. He noted that higher-yielding varieties were promoted through agricultural universities, research institutions, and government programmes with the aim of increasing food production. While he acknowledged that these varieties increased yields, he believed that this transition also contributed to the disappearance of many local wheat and rice varieties. He recalled that several indigenous varieties once existed, including a traditional pink rice, although many have since disappeared from cultivation.
When asked how new wheat varieties are developed, Khan described conventional cross-pollination as a natural breeding process in which plants with desirable characteristics are selected and crossed over successive generations. He contrasted this with genetically modified crops, which involve altering the plant’s DNA. He added that farmers who adopt hybrid varieties generally need to purchase new seed each season because the desired characteristics are not reliably maintained in saved seed.
Khan attributed the increasing dependence on chemical fertilisers and pesticides to the degradation of soil ecosystems through intensive tillage. He explained that healthy soils contain diverse microorganisms, fungi, and bacteria that exist in symbiotic relationships with plants, helping them obtain nutrients and maintain natural resilience. He specifically referred to Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) bacteria as one component of the soil’s natural defence system, explaining that these bacteria produce proteins that are harmful to certain insect pests. He argued that excessive tillage disrupts these microbial communities, raises soil temperatures, damages soil structure, and reduces the soil’s natural biological defences. As a result, farmers become increasingly reliant on synthetic pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, and fertilisers.
Khan described pest resistance as a layered ecological process. He argued that healthy plants first emit natural chemical signals that discourage insect attack. If insects still feed on the crop, he suggested that naturally occurring Bt bacteria in healthy soils provide a second line of defence by affecting the insects. Even when some insect feeding occurs, he believed that plants are often capable of compensatory growth by producing additional branches. Finally, he explained that healthy ecosystems support birds and other natural predators that help regulate pest populations. In his view, these interconnected ecological relationships reduce the need for chemical pest control when soil ecosystems remain intact.
Rather than calling for a complete return to historical farming practices, Khan proposed that agriculture should imitate the functioning of natural ecosystems. He referred to this approach as Paidaar Qudrati Nizaam-e-Kashtkari (PQNK), describing it as a farming system that seeks to replicate the ecological balance of environments such as the Amazon rainforest. He suggested that restoring healthy soil ecosystems would reduce soil degradation, improve natural pest regulation, and lessen dependence on chemical inputs. He also noted that this approach is not currently supported at the government level in Pakistan, although some individual farmers have begun adopting similar practices independently.
When discussing regulation, Khan stated that agricultural chemicals are not adequately regulated in Pakistan. Referring to companies such as Bayer, Monsanto, and Syngenta, he described them as agricultural input suppliers and argued that their business models contribute to farmers’ long-term dependence on commercial seeds and chemical inputs. He further expressed the view that while these products may provide short-term increases in productivity, they also contribute to soil degradation and have broader consequences for food quality and human health.
Project Precedents/ Inspirations
The precedents for this project come from artists and filmmakers who use simple gestures, immersive environments, and performative situations to produce complex social and emotional meanings. What connects them for me is how they work through space, movement, image, participation, and atmosphere.
The beauty of Tania Bruguera’s works is the simplicity of her work that comes out of complex ideas that makes her really important for me as an artist . In works such as Tatlin’s Whisper #5 (2008), she uses a very simple act to produce a powerful awareness of control, fear, and the politics of the body. The work involved mounted police using crowd control techniques inside the museum, so that visitors encountered authority as a live and physical presence, often before realizing that they themselves were part of the performance. What interests me in Bruguera’s practice is the way she does not overcomplicate the form. The work is simple in form, but is [politically charged. This has influenced how I think about using performance, participation, and space to produce unease, awareness, and attention.

‘Tatlin’s Whisper #5 (2008)’
Pipilotti Rist is important for this project for the way she builds immersive environments through video, sound, colour, and installation. Her work shows how moving image can expand beyond the screen and become spatial and bodily. In Ever Is Over All (1997), for example, a woman moves through the street smashing car windows with a flower, in a work that combines disruption, playfulness, and visual seduction. What inspires me are her installations that create an atmosphere that are sensorial, disorienting, and emotionally charged at the same time. This has informed my interest in building environments that viewers enter physically rather than simply observe from a distance.

‘Ever Is Over All’
Joan Jonas has been especially influential in the way I think about the relationship between performance, video, gestural acts, and space. Her installations and performances do not separate body and image. Instead, they allow them to intersect into one another. Works such as Reanimation (2014) and Moving Off the Land II (2019) are especially important to me because they show how video can operate with performance and blur the boundaries between the two. This connects closely to my own interest in installation art, gestural based immersive performances combined with projection, and the relation between live presence and mediated image.

‘Reanimation’

‘Moving Off the Land II 2019’

‘Moving Off the Land II 2019’
Ideation/ Design process/ Experiments with light.
In the making of this work, weather and light became a major part of the process. Filming was repeatedly affected by rain, delays in the camera setup, and changing conditions in the field and because of this, each visit produced a different result. The first five images focus on these changes in light. Each time I visited, the same site looked different depending on the weather, time of day, and sun light. Since the final work brings together footage from different shoots, these chnages in lighting became important in deciding how the videos could be joined and how the final piece would bring the visual together.





The next four images focus on the changing colour of the wheat. In the earlier images, the wheat is still green. In the later ones, its colour begins to change as a result of rain, and sun. The chnaging colour of the wheat, and the lighting, have greatly influenced how I thought about the final form of the video and how the work would be edited and presented.




.
.The outcome went through a lot of trial and error, and many works that I initially developed did not become part of the final exhibition. As I continued making and reflecting, I realised that the work was becoming less about individual pieces and more about a journey that moves from one stage to the next.
The first two works introduce the research. The first room is based on the Punjabi line “کال تھال نیں توے دے تارے “
(“Time has laid out a starred black iron griddle.”). The viewer remains outside the room and looks through its windows, where a storm of wheat hay can be seen moving inside. The room cannot be entered, creating the feeling of witnessing something from a distance.
The second work is a bharola, a traditional wheat storage silo. Inside it is a moving machine, creating a contrast between a domestic object associated with preserving wheat and the industrial systems that have taken over our food. It reflects on how industry has entered something that was once deeply connected to everyday life.
From the third work onwards, the installation follows the journey of a girl who goes back in time and reconnects with a relationship that may have once existed between people and the ancient wheat variety, Sona Moti. In the first phase, she walks through barren fields and plants a single seed. In the second phase, the seeds begin to fall. In the final phase, set within a golden wheat field at the time of harvest, she gradually becomes one with the wheat, almost as if she has transformed into its spirit. Together, these stages explore the relationship between the body, the land, and the seed.
The final installation is very different from where I started. During the process, I explored many different directions. At one point, I made works based on girls playing around the silos. At another stage, I experimented with sculptural forms that looked like barriers. Although these works did not become part of the exhibition, they were an important part of the process because they helped me understand what the work was really trying to become. Every stage of making, testing, and removing something brought me closer to the final outcome.
.
Behind the scenes from one of my video works, where I was performing in a golden wheat field.

One of the many process experiments where I was trying to create the storm effect.
Behind the scenes of my installation space being constructed.
Previous works
speculative project










This speculative proposal was one of the ideas that brought me back to thinking about seeds. Developed for a theory course, it imagines a community-led seed vault on the Potohar Plateau, inspired by Vandana Shiva’s Navdanya initiative. Many of the questions it raised continued into my thesis research.
This was my proposal for a theory course and one of the ideas that brought me back to thinking about seeds. It envisioned a speculative community-led seed vault on the Potohar Plateau, inspired by Vandana Shiva’s Navdanya.





Feedback and Reflection
The jurors spoke about how my practice could continue to develop in different directions. They suggested that I continue developing the research alongside its more poetic and material expression, allowing both to evolve together within my practice. They encouraged me to keep exploring the relationship between these two aspects of the work.
We also discussed the curation of the installation. The jurors asked whether I had experimented with different ways of displaying the work and, after I shared some of my research with them, suggested that I could include literature in the exhibition. They felt this would bring the research into the exhibition while preserving the poetic nature of the work. One of the jurors also described the work as having innocence and sophistication.
This discussion gave me new ways of thinking about the future of the work. It encouraged me to continue developing both the research and its poetic material expression while considering how these two can remain in dialogue as the practice evolves.
كال تھال نے توے دے تارے
Installation with wheat straw and LED lights
Untitled
Video Installation with Bharola and Ladder

Untitled
Four-Channel Video installation
Duration: 4:32
Untitled
Video Installation with Soil
Untitled
Single-Channel Video installation
Duration: 3:51
Bibliography
Brecht, Bertolt. Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic. Edited and translated by John Willett. London: Methuen, 1964.
https://sabraojournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/SABRAO-J-Breed-Genet-55-2-298-308-MS22-76.pdf
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4908315 .
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7611098
https://www.shadabagri.com/blog/wheat-8/wheat-varieties-wheat-production-plan-in-pakistan-15
https://agripunjab.gov.pk/aari-inst-Wheat








































































































































































































































































































































































